Refutation of Their First Failed Attempt to Demonstrate Error

The Resistance Dominicans made a list in which they attempted to demonstrate errors in Valtorta's work. Here is their first listed item:

Our Lord thinks that words tire now and we must have recourse to visions... of Maria Valtorta;

This statement is not only confusing and ambiguous, but they fail to provide evidence about what they are trying to insinuate and also the relevant context. Fortunately, I already thoroughly analyzed and refuted the same supposition from someone else who argued it with far superior wording and clarity than this ambiguous phrase from the Resistance Dominicans. See the sections "Refuting His First Paragraph", "Refuting His Second Paragraph", "Refuting His Third Paragraph", and "Refuting His Fourth and Fifth Paragraphs" of the following rebuttal for a thorough refutation of this groundless claim: How the Orthodoxy of Maria Valtorta's Work Shines Even More Brightly and Exposing the Methodological and Theological Errors of Anselmo de la Cruz: A Complete Refutation of Anselmo's Flawed Anti-Valtorta Article Entitled "Errors against the Faith in the Work of Maria Valtorta".

Prof. Leo A. Brodeur, M.A., LèsL., Ph.D., H.Sc.D., wrote:76

Let us return to the alleged dogmatic or moral errors which some opponents of the Poem of the Man-God claim to find in it. The alleged errors result from the opponents' own doing: they rarely present complete quotations, they mutilate them; they wrench the quotations out of context, when only the context gives them their proper meaning; they sometimes even go so far as to falsify certain texts. Also, the testimony of those opponents often is not credible because of their lack of knowledge in mystical theology, their ignorance of Valtorta's work, or their prejudice against it. Some have even gone so far as to declare publicly that they had not read it and did not intend to in the least.