Introduction

Theological Errors and Incompetency, Methodological Flaws, Distortions and Misrepresentations, Lack of Objectivity, and Ignorance on the Subject They Are Writing About:
How the Resistance Dominican’s Anti-Valtorta Article Lacks Substance and Credibility and Stands Completely Refuted

By Stephen Austin, August 2016 (Updated May 2017 and April 2018)

I have analyzed just about every major anti-Valtorta argument and article in the English language and have either referred to another person's refutation or wrote one myself which demonstrates that the arguments and articles in question are based on errors/falsehoods, methodological and logical fallacies, deficient theology, ignorance of relevant facts, wrenching of statements out of context with false unsubstantiated insinuations, or unsubstantiated subjective impressions which are contradicted by those of greater learning and authority than the critics. In the case of the Resistance Dominican anti-Valtorta article, this proves to also be the case, as we shall see.

On the next page is a Table of Contents of the various parts of the refutation of the Resistance Dominican's article. If you don't want to read the whole article from top to bottom, you can skip to whatever section is of interest to you. You can click on any of the sections in the Table of Contents and it will jump you directly to that section.